Chores, microtasks and crowdworking - Regulation

 

Mobility  Accommodation  Delivery and logistics  Finance

Chores logo

E-commerce  Social media  health

This section contains a list of the main regulatory tools which have recently been deployed in different countries to address the economic and legal challenges raised by digital platforms. In particular, three typologies  of regulation have been taken into consideration: national / domestic laws, court decisions, antitrust authorities deliberations.

All the regulatory measures stored in the section can be easily accessed through links which allow to read their official version. Keywords and tags are associated to each of the regulatory measures with the aim of providing a short description of their content.

 
COUNTRYDOCUMENTTAG 
USANew York Court of AppealsTaskRabbit, labour, unemployment insurance 
USAState of New York . Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardTaskRabbit, labour, unemployment insurance 
USAUS District Court Northern District of CaliforniaHandy, labour, dispute resolution mechanisms 
USANational Labor Relations BoardHandy, labour, employment relationship 
GermanyMunich Higher Labour Court - December 2019crowdworking, employment relationship 
GermanyFederal Labour Court - December 2020crowdworking, employment relationship 
DenmarkHilfr collective bargaining agreement - 2018cleaning services, collective barganing agreement, employment classification 
DenmarkDanish competition authority - 2020Hilfr, collective bargaining agreement, cleaning services, employment classification 
AustraliaAirtasker agreement - 2017Airtasker, Unions NSW, collective bargaining agreement 

 

Do you want to know more? Have a look at the Literature and case studies section

With the support of