In this area it is possible to find a series of articles, working papers, scientific publications on academic journals. The aim of this section is providing an updated picture of the best research about platforms and digital markets, with a focus on theoretical problems, regulatory issues and socio-economic empirical analyses. The works stored in this section are classified according to their research area and geographical scope and can be easily accessed through links. | Year | Author | Title | TAG | | 2017 | Adams-Prassl A., Berg J. | When Home Affects Pay: An Analysis of the Gender Pay Gap among Crowdworkers | crowdworking, labour | | 2018 | Aleksynska M., Bastrakova A., Karchenko N. | Work on digital labour plaforms in Ukraine | Ukraine, crowdworking | | 2016 | De Groen W. P., Maselli I., Fabo P. | The Digital Market for Local Services: A one-night stand for workers? An example from the on-demand economy | Belgium, online labour markets, efficiency | | 2011 | Felstiner A. | Working the Crowd: Employment and Labor Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry | Amazon Mechanical Turk, labour | | 2017 | Hannak A., Wagner C., Garcia D., Strohmaier M., Wilson C. | Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit | TaskRabbit, gender bias, racial bias | | 2019 | Le Ludec C., Tubaro P., Casilli A. | How many people microwork in France? Estimating the size of a new labour force | France, microwork | | 2018 | McHugh J. W. | Looking Through the (Mis)classifieds: Why TaskRabbit is Better Suited than Uber and Lyft to succeed against a Worker Misclassification Claim | labour, TaskRabbit | | 2017 | Minter K. | Negotiating labour standards in the gig economy: Airtasker and Unions NSW | Airtasker, labour | | 2021 | Toxtli C., Suri S., Savage S. | Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd Work | Amazon Mechanical Turk, labour | | 2016 | Unions NSW | Innovation or Exploitation. Busting the Airtasker myth | Airtasker, labour |
|
